|
|
Business as usual?
 
 What a useful Bushie.
"A leader is a dealer in hope."
Napoleon Bonaparte What has Vee Jay been reading lately? Amateur Hour at the White House,
by Richard Cohen washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64238-2003Jan16.html Joe Millionaire for President,
January 18, 2003,
by Frank Rich nytimes.com/2003/01/18/opinion/18RICH.html When the Enemy Is a Liberator,
February 16, 2003,
by John F. Burns nytimes.com/2003/02/16/weekinreview/16BURN.html Peking Duct Tape,
February 16, 2003,
by Thomas L. Friedman nytimes.com/2003/02/16/opinion/16FRIE.html Antiwar Marches Reveal Gulf Between Leaders and People,
February 16, 2003,
by Alan Cowell nytimes.com/2003/02/16/international/europe/16CND-BLAIR.html Australians Begin Second Day of Global Protests,
February 16, 2003,
by Reuters nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-iraq-protests.html How Four Countries Reacted, and What the Iraqis Said, Too,
February 15, 2003 nytimes.com/2003/02/15/international/middleeast/15DTEX.html Military Solution to an Economic Crisis rupe-india.org/34/military.html (A largely business as usual analysis) Some speculate about whether GWB will be reelected in 2004. That there is anything less than an absolute certainty that GWB will be reelected in 2004 just does not compute. "The only concern of GWB is to get
and to keep oil prices low
until the 2004 election. " groups.yahoo.com/group/energyresources/message/30486 We are in a time window of about 33 years in which the plutocracy aims to self-fulfill biblical prophecy. The magnitude of the horrors involved is enermous. Most just can't think in terms of anything but business as usual. Many speculate about oil prices and availability. "Reports on a possible permanent sacrifice of some of Venezuelan
oil production due to the production cut which was a part of the
middle class strike, are not encouraging.
The natural gas situation through 2004 will indicate switching
some natural gas comsumption to oil, which won't be there." groups.yahoo.com/group/energyresources/message/30486 The BBC has presented film clips featuring the Iraqi king and the future government of Iraq which has been assembled in Britain and is just waiting to jump on the plane for Baghdad. And yet, morons around the globe continue to speculate about whether there will be a regime change in Iraq as well as other possible regime changes. "A possibility for the replacement of Iraqi oil is Saudi Arabia.
The Bush regime has made it clear that it wants to terminate the
current regime in Saudi Arabia. It may have been indiscreet. Saudi
Arabia's resources in terms of missiles and bombs deliverable may
be grossly inferior, but it has other resources." "If Al Qaeda concludes that the civilian population of Saudi
Arabia must suffer in order to destroy the infidel empire,
it may take a hand. In any case, an enormous proportion of Saudi
Arabia's capacity would have to go out of production before the
kingdom's gross revenue would suffer since oil prices would
spike. It would be possible to at least severely wound the
infidel empire and terminate the career of George W. Bush
without causing undue pain to the Saudi population. " "Finally, the Bush regime has made clear that Iran is high on its
list of targets for 'regime change', presumably also by war. The
major Iranian oil fields are located conveniently close to the
Iraqi border. However, the Iranian oil installations also may
not survive the war intact. " "The United States *may* have a last chance in 2004 to terminate
the imperial regime and change course. The very best of luck to
you.
Doug Woodard
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada" groups.yahoo.com/group/energyresources/message/30486 Don't count on it. George Bush is going for all the marbles. And that means ALL the marbles, jelly bean. Domination not just in terms of economics and military might but also, ideological dogma which especially is inclusive of religion. And human numbers. He intends to "correct" the 20/80 divide, albeit in his own creative fashion. That's the long and short of it. The vast majority of humans have yet to wake up and smell the coffee. Topics of conversation, op-eds, newsgroups,etc., around the web as well as in the real world viz a viz the activities of George Bush clearly indicate that his ultimate intentions are not understood. Some understand what Bush's intentions may portend but just can't seem to accept that he and some of his key pillars of support could actually be serious. They can't believe that it could actually become reality. These Bushies are totally serious, totally committed. Even more so than the "independent counsel, Kennie Star. What an indefatigable little rodent he was. 
What isn't yet within the collective cognitive grasp of humanity is that they thoroughly and absolutely understand the situation of the world. Why? Because they created it. And they are not going to let anything deter them from the historic opportunity they have created for themselves. They are operating from a position of overwhelming power and strength, not from a position of weakness. France? A loyal friend of the USA with hundreds of thousands of Islamists living within its very borders. What else can France do? Germany? Schroeder is smart. But Germany is still a loyal friend. What else could Germany do? It doesn't amount to anything more than posturing. United Nations? Bush still pulls its strings. Dr. Blix is still pretending to ferret out those nasty WMD. Demonstrations? Public opinion? Plutocratic wirepullers are masters of deception. They are adept at manufacturing hoaxes, hobgoblins as well as consent. The masses they decieve are confused, gullible, ignorant and stupid. Bushies aren't confused in the least by the plethora of red herrings floating about. The red herrings which were not created by Bushies can easily be manipulated by Bushies. And in fact the more that Bush acts against public opinion, the better off he is going to be. Anti-war protesters are destined to have egg on their faces and they will also have CIA/FBI dossier file numbers after the dust settles. Additionally angry Islamists are an integral part of his master plan. The angrier they, are the better. The more that they are injured in spite of sympathetic world opinion, the angrier and more vengeful and more likely to vigorously attack they will become. Remember that the responsibility for a world war can not under any circumstances be seen to have been any judeochristian group or entity. Really, really, really angry Islamists are essential. All that is left to be done is to pull the plug on energy. That can be done at any time. If for example, any oil source such as Saudi Arabia is attacked prematurely, as Mr Woodard has suggested, the dominoes will simply start their fall from that point. Besides all that is actually required is the perception that oil/energy flow has been cut or severely endangered. The ridiculous events of the summer of 2002 in California were nothing more than a trial run to practice cutting eenergy. It was a total success. The masses didn't have the foggiest idea what was really happening. But why not wait until after a regime change or two? Why not have a quick war or coup or voluntary exile scenario in Iraq at the very least? Consent for just about anything King George or Squire Blair could cook up would be so much easier to manufacture after that by several orders of magnitude. 
 From here? Checkmate in eight moves or less. Doesn't anybody play chess anymore?
|
Masa is one of those really brainy types who has read a lot. In English, too. He's even read Max Weber, with whom he took great exception, being neither Protestant nor Christian. His comments on thie article above: Max Weber points out Capitalism, especially American Capitalism looks successful from the standpoint of the Protestantism-Protestants
spirit. Weber states that business leaders and owners of capital, as well as the higher grades of skilled labour, and even more the
higher technically and commercially trained personnel of modern enterprises, are overwhelmingly Protestant in his "The
Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism".
However, American Capitalism has already been, as is well known, proved to be illusion.
Bush shows a strong attitute towards Iraq because he knows he must conceal this circumstance. The US may otherwise lose an ideological pawn in the chess game to
control world hegemony.
The next World will be a struggle for supremacy among EU, Middle east and Aisa lead by China.
Bush is scared about this conclusion.
by Masa Our answer: Bush isn't stupid. He knows the score. Nor is Bush running scared. The world has been painted into a corner by being hugely overpopulated. The world is highly vulnerable now, in the present. And China becomes more vulnerable as it imports more and more of its food. Waiting for future developments only adds more icing on the cake. Bush is holding all the trump cards. Do you really think he'll give any advantage away? All that is left to be done is to pull the plug on energy. That can be done at any time. Masa added:
Buddycom wrote; There will be life after WWlll. There will be religion.
After the war, there will be no life, no religion. That will be the end of the world. Our answer: Masa still has his business as usual mind set in place. He doesn't understand that WWll was being planned as the Armistice for WWl was being signed. Everybody whose neo cortex was functioning properly implored the signers not to impose such draconian conditions on Germany after WWl. Did they listen? Of course not! Result: WWll. Nor has he come to grips with the fact that the Cold War turned out to be a perfect excuse to get the vast majority of nuclear weapons into the hands of two future G8 nations. The plutocracy is still way ahead of Masa's thinking processes. There will be life after WWlll. There will be judeochristian religion as well. Can the same be said for Buddhism? Maybe, maybe not. What about Hinduism? The BUSHIES are well prepared. They are counting on you to disbelieve that they will actually execute their well laid plans. You won't let them down, will you? See also Richard Duncan's conclusions: buddycom.com/ecol/Brainfood/duncanoil.html More true Bushie thinking on Religion: buddycom.com/japan/buddha/pathenry.html New book by Richard Heinberg
 The Party's Over
Oil, War, and The Fate of Industrial Societies
Industrial nations' fossil-fueled joyride is about to end . . . is anyone prepared? Richard Heinberg read this page and commented, "I suspect that (this page, VJ30) is correct."  Richard Heinberg MuseLetter.com
|
|
Asimov's New Guide to Science, 1987 Chapter16, Humanity's Future, page 744,
Isaac Asimov "To be sure, the movement in the direction of population control, essential
though it would seem to anyone capable of a moment's thought, is not without its opponents. In the United States, an
active group opposes not only abortion but also the kind of sex education in schools and the availability of
contraceptive devices that would make abortion unnecessary. The only way of legitimately lowering the birth rate, in
their view, is by sexual abstention, something that no sane person would suppose that people can be talked into. This
group calls itself the 'Right to Life,' but a better name for people who do not recognize the dangers of overpopulation
would be the 'Right to Fatal Stupidity.'" "The history of war is the history of powerful individuals willing to sacrifice
thousands upon thousands of other people's lives for personal gains. ~ Michael Rivero
Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography,
Chapter 10: "In 1969 Bush told the House of Representatives that, unless the menace of human population growth were
*recognized and made manageable, starvation, pestilence and war will solve it for us.* Bush repeatedly compared
population growth to a disease. [9 bis] In remarks to the House July 30, 1969, he likened the fight against the polio
virus to the crusade to reduce the world's population. Urging the federal government to step up population control
efforts, he said: *We have a clear precedent: When the Salk vaccine was discovered, large-scale programs were
undertaken to distribute it. I see no reason why similar programs of education and family planning assistance should
not be instituted in the United States on a massive scope.* As Jessica Mathews, vice-president of one of Washington's
most influential zero-growth outfits, the World Resources Institute, later wrote of Bush in those years: *In the 1960s
and '70s, Bush had not only embraced the cause of domestic and international family planning, he had aggressively
sought to be its champion.... As a member of the Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Bush shepherded the first major
breakthrough in domestic family planning legislation in 1967,* and *later co -authored the legislation commonly known
as Title X, which created the first federal family planning program....* *On the international front,* Mathews wrote,
Bush *recommended that the U.S. support the United Nations population fund.... He urged, in the strongest words, that
the U.S. and European countries make modern contraceptives available *on a massive scale,* to all those around the
world who wanted them." tarpley.net/bush10.htm
Bush senior recognized the world's most pressing problem, HUMAN OVERPOPULATION. Bush
jr. recognizes many reasons why it is crucially important to deny even the remotest possibility that overpopulation is
a problem, while exhacerbating that problem to the greatest extent which is possible. Bush junior, who has quite
aptly been called the Manichean president, knows that overpopulation is the means by which the rest of the world has
been made vulnerable to the master plan. In 1969 Bush senior told the House of Representatives, unless the menace of human population growth were
*recognized and made manageable, starvation, pestilence and war will solve it for us.* Bush junior sees human overpopulation not as the problem, but rather, as the solution.  The most
dangerous men in America. During the summer of 2002, Bush put the words "historic opportunity," into every other sentence he uttered in front of a news camera. Historic Opportunity? For What? For Armageddon and the Rapture - Now.
What is The Rapture? raptureme.com/


"The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity
and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It
regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life."
- Adolph Hitler, My New World Order, Proclamation
to the German Nation at Berlin, February 1, 1933. 
 outragedcomics.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither" - Thomas Jefferson |
|
Suggested Reading.
Yertle's story leads off with his attempt to build a bigger kingdom on the backs of his
loyal subjects, literally. King of everything he can see, Yertle orders his turtles to stack up under him to build a
towering throne. "He made each turtle stand on another one's back and he piled them all up in a nine-turtle stack." But
a plain little turtle named Mack--stuck at the bottom--decides he's had enough. "I know up on top you are seeing great
sights, but down on the bottom we, too, should have rights!" Amazon.com
In real life, of course, there isn't such a happy ending.  One of the elephants in the living room: Overpopulation? What overpopulation?
 One of the elephants in the living room: Oil crisis? What oil crisis?
|
|