|
D.T. SUZUKI "According to the philosophy of
Zen, we are too much a slave to the conventional way of thinking. which is
dualistic through and through. No "interpenetration" is allowed, there takes
place no fusing of opposites in our everyday logic. What belongs to God is not
of this world, and what is of this world is incompatible with the divine. Black
is not white, and white is not black. Tiger is tiger, and cat is cat, and they
will never be one. Water flows, a mountain towers. This is the way things or
ideas go in this universe of the senses and syllogisms. Zen, however, upsets
this scheme of thought and substitutes a new one in which there exists no
logic, no dualistic arrangement of ideas. We believe in dualism chiefly because
of our traditional training. Whether ideas really correspond to facts is
another matter requiring a special investigation. Ordinarily we do not inquire
into the matter, we just accept what is instilled into our minds; for to accept
is more convenient and practical, and life is to a certain extent, though not
in reality, made thereby easier. We are in nature conservatives, not because we
are lazy, but because we like repose and peace, even superficially. But the
time comes when traditional logic holds true no more, for we begin to feel
contradictions and splits and consequently spiritual anguish. We lose trustful
repose which we experienced when we blindly followed the traditional ways of
thinking. Eckhart says that we are all seeking repose whether consciously or
not just as the stone cannot cease moving until it touches the earth. Evidently
the repose we seemed to enjoy before we were awakened to the contradictions
involved in our logic was not the real one, the stone has kept moving down
toward the ground. Where then is the ground of non-dualism on which the soul
can be really and truthfully tranquil and blessed? To quote Echart again,
"Simple people conceive that we are to see God as if He stood on that side and
we on this. It is not so; God and I are one in the act of my perceiving Him."
In this absolute oneness of things Zen establishes the foundations of its
philosophy. The idea of absolute oneness is not the exclusive possesion of Zen.
There are other religious and philosophies that preach the same doctrine. If
Zen, like other monisms or theisms, merely laid down this principle and did not
have anythng specifically to be known as Zen, it would have long ceased to
exist as such. But there is in Zen something unique which makes up its life and
justifies its claim to be the most precious heritage of Eastern culture. The
following "Mondo" or dialogue (literally questioning and answering) will give
us a glimsp into the ways of Zen, A monk asked Joshu, one of the greatest
masters in China, "What is the ultimate word of Truth?" Instead of giving him
any specific answer he made a simple response saying, "Yes." The monk who
naturally failed to see any sense in this kind of response asked for a second
time, and to this the Master roared back. "I am not deaf!" See how irrelevantly
(shall I say) the all-important problem of absolute oneness or of the ultimate
reason is treated here! But this is characteristic of Zen, this is where Zen
transcends logic and overrides the tyranny and misrepresentation of ideas. As I
have said before, Zen mistrusts the intellect, does not rely upon traditional
and dualistic methods of reasoning, and handles problems after its own original
manners....To understand all this, it is necessary that we should learn to look
at things from a new point of view."
ALBERT EINSTEIN "A human being is part of the Whole...He
experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the
rest...a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind
of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a
few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by
widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole
of nature in its beauty. Nobody is able to achieve this completely, but the
striving for such achievement is, in itself, a part of the liberation and a
foundation for inner security".
ERWIN SCHROEDINGER "Hence this life of yours which you are
living is not merely a piece of the entire existence, but is, in a certain
sense, the WHOLE; only this whole is not so constituted that it can be surveyed
in one single glance. This, as we know, is what the Brahmins express in the
sacred, mystic formula which is yet so simple and so clear: "Tat Tvam asi".
this is you...And not merely "someday"; now, today, every day she is bringing
you forth, not once, but thousands upon thousands of times, just as every day
she engulfs you a thousand times over. For eternally and always there is only
now, one and the same now; the present is the only thing that has no end."
JONAS SALK "Matter at each level of complexity appears to
consist of two interdependent, nonidentical elements in dynamic interaction and
in integral relation to each other. It appears that an interacting, dynamic,
asymmetrical binary relationship is the fundamental module of order in the
cosmos. I have the impression that the interactions in these dynmamic
asymmetrical binary systems underlie all phenomena in nature...The most
fundamental phenomena in the universe is relationship. It then becomes possible
to recognize the underlying unity in all the diversity of the phenomena of
life."
ALDOUS HUXLEY "Every individual is at once the beneficiary
and the victim of the linguistic tradition into which he has been born - the
beneficiary inasmuch as language gives access to the accumulated records of
other people's experience, the victim in so far as it confirms him in the
belief that reduced awareness is the only awareness and as it bedevils his
sense of reality, so that he is all too apt to take his concepts for data, his
words for actual things." |